Discover the future of Firm AI for the business of law
On November 10, see how Intapp Celeste brings Firm AI to life as the operating layer for professional firms.
· 7 min read
In a previous article, I wrote about the importance of putting client success at the forefront of a meaningful key client program. Building on this, leading firms are also focusing on how they bring a client to that successful outcome, and the experience the client enjoys (or doesn’t) in the process.
Firms that align their internal process with client expectations, and work to ensure seamless transitions between different departments, create better client experiences, more consistently. It is this overall client experience that differentiates the leaders from everyone else.
Achieving a great client experience involves a more detailed understanding of the various stages of the relationship, both from the firm’s perspective – sometimes referred to as the Client Matter Lifecycle (CML) – and the client’s experience or journey. However, tensions between the firm and client can sometimes arise, impacting the quality of that journey. For example:
Below, I examine four areas of the firm and client relationship that can have a material impact on the overall client experience, and that firms are well-served to optimise.
For most firms, the client matter lifecycle starts with the opening of a matter. But for the client, the journey typically starts well before that.
Clients experience a spectrum of legal issues, ranging from everyday business challenges to more complex, individual events (internal and external) that require extra support. Before a General Counsel seeks external advice, they will typically have gone through a myriad business discussions, including considering what to handle in-house and what to outsource. It’s usually the more complex matters on which external counsel is sought, and the everyday issues that are handled in-house.
More innovative firms understand this dynamic and position themselves to help General Counsel strengthen the ability of their in-house teams to be self-supporting, while providing more substantive advice when the complex challenges arise. In most firms, business development teams will be heavily involved during these early stages of client development, but quite often this is seen as a completely separate process rather than the first stage of the client matter lifecycle.
By treating business development as the start of the lifecycle, firms (and their clients) can benefit from having a better understanding of when to proactively develop or reactively cover the client as events unfold. The firm will also be able to put this in the broader commercial context in which the client is seeking legal advice. This leads to a more seamless experience for the client, moving between day-to-day relations with the firm and having better support on more complex matters.
Once instructed by a new client, the process of on-boarding and opening the relevant matter is often viewed as little more than necessary administration. Although issues such as conflict and anti-money laundering checks are critical from a risk management perspective, they are often of little interest to the wider firm.
Calling it a ‘secret’ may be overstating things, yet it’s surprising how many General Counsel list communication as the number one challenge they face when dealing with law firms. Interestingly, it is not always a lack of communication at issue, rather a multitude of uninformative touch points interpreted as an attempt to justify a substantial fee.
A simple but effective approach to counter this is for the firm to walk in their client’s shoes and provide only meaningful updates, including a timely explanation of when nothing appears to have progressed. This will more often than not help avoid instances of over or under-communicating, and lead to a smoother journey for both parties.
The majority of firms have strategic plans to build key client relationships that will generate, in some cases, as much as 80% of the firm’s total revenue. However, those very same firms quite often have an internal client matter lifecycle process that finishes when the matter is successfully (or otherwise) concluded for the client.
At this stage, some firms now pass the baton back to the business development team as part of a separate process to gather client feedback and extract key learnings for future pitches. Unfortunately, few firms see the client matter lifecycle as a continuous process that if done well, will exponentially increase returns for them and their clients.
The conclusion of a matter, whether it has been successful or not, should be seen by the firm as an opportunity to deepen the client relationship and commence the next matter lifecycle from a better starting point. Leading firms schedule face-to-face meetings after the matter has concluded, with members of the delivery and business development teams attending. They use these opportunities to:
Benefits of a retrospective face-to-face meeting with a client and firm
As we start year 2020, clients have more options than ever before when choosing external legal services support. Within any given practice area, there will be a number of competing law firms that will likely provide a similar final outcome for the client at a comparable price level.
The client experience is therefore paramount. Ultimately, it’s your people and how they approach client service that create that experience – and it happens across every touchpoint on the client journey.
Understanding that it’s about the journey, and not the destination is the best step you can take toward the creation of sustained success for your clients and the firm. I encourage you to learn more about improving your client’s journey through Intapp’s Leaders & Professionals solution that equips your firm with intelligence from activities across the entire client lifecycle, from sourcing through origination and execution.