The Back Channel

How Firm AI tackles the biggest challenges accounting and consulting firms face today

While AI is helping accounting and consulting firms substantially improve productivity and deliver more client value, it’s also changing client expectations and adding compliance risk. At the same time, firms are grappling with talent shortages, margin pressures, and intense competition. We met with Tom Koehler, Intapp’s Global Managing Principal of Accounting and Consulting, to talk about agentic Firm AI — AI built for the business of the firm. He shared how Firm AI helps firms tackle their biggest challenges by supporting new approaches to pricing and growth, enforcing compliance, codifying a firm’s judgment, and increasing capacity without adding headcount. Here are the highlights.

November 6, 2026 · 8 min read

How does Firm AI change the economics of accounting and consulting firms — particularly the relationship between capacity and revenue growth?

Tom Koehler

Tom koehler

The old equation — add more people to generate more revenue — no longer holds. That model has been under pressure for some time now. Clients expect AI-driven efficiencies to lower fees, while firms are struggling to find enough talent to support continued growth.

Firm AI breaks the link between revenue and headcount because it completes routine work with agentic AI coworkers that scale with demand.

Firm AI also transforms accounting and consulting firms internally, creating significant opportunities to improve operational excellence.

For example, a conflicts team that clears 200 engagements a month is capped by its hours. With Firm AI, agentic AI coworkers screen the routine work so the same team can handle an order of magnitude more. Of course, high-stakes decisions are still routed to a professional, which underscores that human judgment will remain essential in the future.

It goes without saying that there are further significant productivity gains to be realized by using Firm AI throughout the entire engagement lifecycle, from origination and onboarding to delivery and billing.

Hence, agentic Firm AI does more than automate tasks; it accelerates the shift to a new operating model that changes how firms manage and deliver work.

I call it the agentic target operating model. Firm leaders have to rethink roles and business capabilities from an agentic AI perspective and redesign front-, middle- and back-office functions accordingly.

This is important because the real prize sits in overhead. Business services typically consume 15 to 25% of revenue1. With clients expecting lower fees in return for AI-driven efficiencies, firms must look to another category of agentic AI to protect margins and increase operating efficiencies. That’s what Firm AI is built for: Its core focus is building operational excellence, and it creates unprecedented operating leverage.

Agentic Firm AI does more than automate tasks; it accelerates the shift to a new operating model that changes how firms manage and deliver work.

Tom Koehler, Global Managing Principal, Accounting and Consulting, Intapp

How does Firm AI help accounting firms navigate talent shortages without compromising quality?

Tom Koehler

Tom koehler

Enrollment in four-year accounting programs is up 8.9%. This is the third straight year of growth, but today’s freshmen won’t be hiring-ready until the early 2030s. So firms still have to manage the talent gap creatively.

Firm AI addresses the talent shortage three ways.

First, as alluded to previously, it hands routine work that consumes a large share of professionals’ non-billable time to agentic AI coworkers — work like completing timesheets, intake forms, conflicts questionnaires, and status compilations.

Second, it supports and accelerates practitioners’ judgment — about which clients to accept, which estimates to challenge, and when to walk away — with playbooks that are executed consistently by AI coworkers that flag exceptions for review. So when someone retires, the expertise and institutional knowledge stays.

Third, it reshapes roles, so there are fewer preparers and more reviewers. Operations staff spends less time on data entry and more time on judgment, which makes better use of scarce talent, and provides a more attractive entry point for the next generation.

Quality holds because the model assumes fewer people, not more trust in the machine. Consequential decisions stay with professionals, every AI action is logged and auditable, and the review bar remains high.

How is private equity’s approach to value creation in professional services changing, and what role do you see agentic AI playing as things evolve?

Tom Koehler

Tom koehler

To understand where private equity is headed, it helps to look at where it’s been.

Private equity’s first wave of investment in professional firms was driven by multiple arbitrage: Buy small practices, aggregate them, then sell the combined entity at a premium. With many firms now consolidated, that opportunity is maturing, and the question shifts from how many firms a sponsor can buy to where organic growth will come from next.

Private equity firms sit on both sides of the table, as buyers and sellers. In professional services, the priorities are the same either way: margins that survive fee deflation, capacity that doesn’t depend on hires who don’t exist, and controls that satisfy firmwide governance.

Agentic AI is becoming central to all these things. But it also introduces risk: An ungoverned agent inside a portfolio company is a regulatory finding waiting to be written, and a discount at exit.

It’s becoming more obvious that the next wave of deals will be priced on operational excellence in addition to financials. Firms that can prove they run governed AI — not just claim it — will command a premium.

This is where Firm AI comes in. It supplies the governance needed to use AI responsibly by logging every AI action and enforcing independence, conflicts, and entity boundaries across core systems. And it adds capacity without adding headcount, so growth stops being constrained by the labor market, and unit costs rise more slowly than revenue. So when it’s time to exit, the buyer’s due diligence will confirm a strong valuation.

It’s becoming more obvious that the next wave of deals will be priced on operational excellence in addition to financials. Firms that can prove they run governed AI — not just claim it — will command a premium.

Tom Koehler, Global Managing Principal, Accounting and Consulting, Intapp

As AI becomes a commodity, how can accounting and consulting firms differentiate themselves?

Tom Koehler

Tom koehler

When every firm’s professionals use the same horizontal tools, the productivity those tools deliver stops being a differentiator.

The Big Four make this point at enterprise scale: McKinsey has 20,000 AI agents supporting its work, EY plans to have 100,000 agents by 2028, KPMG has committed to billions of dollars in AI spend, and Deloitte uses Zora AI™ to augment its workforce.

However, every market leader has two advantages that their competitors simply can’t buy.

The first is the firm’s “memory”: every engagement delivered, deal passed, fee held or broken, and conflict cleared or escalated — plus the reasoning behind each decision.

The second is the unwritten judgment and methods of the firm’s practitioners, which inform every decision and continually enrich the firm’s memory. For a century, this passed within the firm by apprenticeship, then left with the practitioner at retirement or lateral exit.

The Firm AI playbooks I mentioned earlier are the first vehicles for permanently codifying a firm’s judgment and methods. Each time a playbook runs, the AI remembers what decisions were made and how, so it gets smarter. Firms that use these playbooks to execute common tasks, such as screening inbound opportunities or conducting conflicts searches, create an ever-growing, proprietary record of their memory and judgment that no model vendor can supply.

In a market where intellectual property and productivity are table stakes, these playbooks empower firms to scale the unique expertise and ways of working that make them stand out from their competitors.

Many consulting firms are moving toward alternative-fee models. How can they make that shift without compromising margins?

Tom Koehler

Tom koehler

Most enterprise buyers now say they want pricing that’s tied to results: 2026 IBM research notes that 83% of consulting firm leaders favor this approach. AI adds to that pressure: When it compresses a 40-hour analysis into a fraction of the time, clients won’t pay for 40 hours.

KPMG’s own auditor made that case in February, when it negotiated down its own audit fee on the grounds that AI had made the work cheaper to perform.

The billable hour isn’t being abolished, but as this example illustrates, it is being audited.

In January 2026, McKinsey’s Global Managing Partner, Bob Sternfels, said on the record in Harvard Business Review that “about a third” of revenue comes from underwriting outcomes. He shared that McKinsey’s own analysis found outcome-fee revenue to be more volatile than hourly billing revenue, and that its partner compensation model wasn’t built to absorb the added volatility.

That’s not an argument against the model; it’s an argument for running it on real-time economics. But most firms don’t have that. Instead, they discover engagement profitability at closeout, which under a fixed fee means discovering the loss after it’s too late to fix it.

In my conversations at top consulting firms, price committees are already asking for fee benchmarks and win-loss history, so the fixed fee is set from evidence rather than optimism. Firm AI facilitates this by providing firms with the real-time data that alternative-fee arrangements require, along with pricing recommendations built from comparable engagements.

Passive time capture, also possible with Firm AI, will become essential, because it will allow firms to see the work as it happens, track profitability, and staff accurately even when hourly billing is no longer the norm.

Last but not least, there are a few things lead partners will always ask for: engagement intelligence, margin alerts, and proactive, real-time visibility into scope creep. Firm AI can provide those too.

The hard part of alternative fees has never been the pricing; it’s been the lack of an operating model providing connected, real-time intelligence. And that’s what Firm AI makes possible.

Firm AI, built on Intapp

Read the Firm AI blueprint to learn about the architecture behind this emerging category of AI, and why it’s your biggest source of competitive leverage.

1 These figures reflect what Intapp consistently sees in practice. They are directional, and should be validated against a firm’s own cost classification before being used for precise planning.